Solutions

ZeroBase for Operations

Would you build it again?

A company founded today, with AI, would not inspect on an interval set at commissioning when condition data already answers the question.

Find the inspection intervals, recurring reviews and dispatch rules your Operations team can stop running on habit. ZeroBase reads work-order and scheduling events, lists every recurring activity, shows what each has found and what it costs in capacity, and stops for a named reviewer before an interval moves.

Start a Clean Sheet Review →
Reads, read-only, from

An interval is a claim about risk. Test it.

Most operational cadence was set at commissioning and inherited since. ZeroBase reads work-order and scheduling metadata and asks what each interval has found, what it costs in capacity, and whether condition data now answers the same question.

01 · Inventory

Every recurring activity, from the work orders.

Twenty-two recurring activities in one Operations function, each built from work-order, scheduling and asset events. Ask in plain language and get the list with findings, capacity and the rule behind the cadence on every row.

Inspection intervals that have not produced a finding in the last four cycles.

Found 22 recurring activities in scope · 8 with no finding on record

D1
Quarterly asset inspectionOPS-0170 findings in 4 cycles · 1,120 h · condition data available
Contested
D2
Weekly operations reviewOPS-004agenda unchanged 12 months · 18 attendees · 940 h
Evidenced
D3
Same-day work ordersOPS-0411,870 raised and closed same day · no parts consumed
Evidenced
D4
Manual dispatch overrideOPS-029overridden in 54% of cases · rule last set 2019
Contested
D5
Shift handover reportOPS-052produced 3× daily · read by 2 of 14 recipients
Evidenced
D6
Annual pressure vessel inspectionOPS-003regulatory · findings in 3 of 4 cycles
Verified

+ 16 more activities

02 · Evidence

Every signal behind a recommendation.

Findings, capacity, condition data and the rule that set the interval, each with the system, query and period it came from. Never a completion rate attached to a named crew.

OPS-017
Quarterly asset inspectionOperations · H. Koç · 1,120 h a year
Redesign

Key signals

Findings

Zero findings across the last four quarterly cycles on 212 assets.

PM orders · 2025-09 → 2026-09
Condition data

Vibration and temperature telemetry available on 198 of 212 assets since 2024.

asset recordshistorian · OT
Rule located

Commissioning specification from 2016 sets the quarterly interval; no risk review since.

policy-register
03 · Ranking

Ranked by what each interval has found.

ZeroBase scores every recurring activity on the findings it produced against the capacity it consumed, explains the score, and routes interval changes to a named reviewer as reversible experiments.

Ranked by evidence score

ActivityOwnerCost / yearDemandRecommendationScore
Quarterly asset inspectionH. Koç1,120 h0 findings / 4Redesign94
Same-day work ordersT. Aksoy760 hno parts consumedRemove90
Weekly operations reviewH. Koç940 hunchanged agendaRedesign87
Manual dispatch overrideT. Aksoy530 h54% overriddenRedesign83
Shift handover reportS. Polat610 h2 / 14 readersRedesign79
Monthly safety walkS. Polat340 hfindings 2 / 4Keep67
Spare-parts countT. Aksoy280 hquarterlyKeep62
Annual pressure vessel inspectionH. Koç410 hregulatoryKeep55

Decisions land where the work already lives.

Every decision leaves with its evidence, its owner and its review date, and goes back into the systems the function runs on.

Compatible target categories · connector coverage is in design-partner validation and no live production integration is claimed.

Re-test one interval, reversibly.

Start with a single asset class. Leave with a cadence the evidence supports and a defined way back if it turns out you were wrong.

A Future Innovation Agents product

Start a Clean Sheet Review →